Iroda Siddikova1 & Nadejda Zubareva2
1Professor at the Comparative Linguistics department of the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek; Tashkent, Uzbekistan; Email: i.siddiqova@nuu.uz
2PhD Candidate at the Comparative Linguistics department of the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek; Tashkent, Uzbekistan; Email: zubarevan@yahoo.com; ORCID 0000-0001-7895-3301 (Corresponding Author)
Volume 12, Number 5, 2020 I Full Text PDF
DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s24n1
Abstract
The political discourse is one of the most dramatic and emotionally expressed types of discourse where intensity could be considered as the means of implementation of pragmatic potential. The preservation of pragmatics of intensifying units as part political discourse while translating them serves to the adequate transformation of the communicative intention of the author and as a result, leads to the achievement of the corresponding communicative effect in the target language. This paper examines ways of translating intensification in the political discourse. Three types of methods for implementing intensification in translation have been discussed: (1) the explicit expression of intensification, (2) the creation of intensity in translation, and (3) the reduction in the intensity of expressions. The results of the study show that not every equivalent translation is recognized as adequate, but only one that meets, in addition to the norm of equivalence, other regulatory requirements.
Keywords: Intensification, Political Discourse, Translation, Communication