Antimonies of Crude Oil Production in the Niger Delta: Reflection on Ahmed Yerima’s Trilogy

Norbert Oyibo Eze¹, Ndubuisi Nnanna² & Emeka Aniago³

¹Senior lecturer, Dept. of Theatre & Film Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

²Lecturer, Dept. of Theatre & Film Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

³Senior lecturer, Dept. of Theatre & Film Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

Email: emekaaniago@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0003-3194-1463.

 Volume 13, Number 3, 2021 I Full-Text PDF

DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v13n3.17

Abstract

We learn from history that some consequences of abysmal government policies and dysfunctional tactics include socio-economic retrogression, increased deprivation ideology, victimhood, rebellion, war and revolution; and theorists have provided several plausible contextualizations for elucidation. One of such conceptualizations is Ted Robert Gurr’s theory of relative deprivation, which can be applied to illuminate sufficiently how discontent enacted in Ahmed Yerima’s trilogy can lead to aggressive responses. Thus, through an interpretive approach, we shall look at how Yerima portrays creatively in his trilogy – Hard Ground, Little Drops, and Ipomu why a show of force, divide and rule, carrot and stick tactics by successive Nigerian governments have exacerbated grief, restiveness and rebellion in Niger Delta because of unwholesome oil exploitation and ineffectual corporate social responsibility approaches. In the end, this study proposes that Niger Delta oil exploitation related discontent will fester and linger if functional inclusiveness and proportional infrastructural development are not deployed progressively.

Keywords: Corruption, crude oil, Niger Delta, rebellion, relative deprivation