Interview

Computer Artist Manuel Felguerez: A Brief Interview on the Pioneering Origins of Geometry Painting

///
408 views

Reynaldo Thompson & Manuel Felguerez

Reynaldo Thompson (professor researcher) Universidad de Guanajuato. Department of Art and Enterprise. Email: thompson@ugto.mx

Manuel Felguerez (artist) email: museomf@hotmail.com

Rupkatha Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 2, April-June, 2022, Pages  https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v14n2.05

First published: June 18, 2022 | Area: Aesthetic Studies | License: CC BY-NC 4.0

(This article is published under Volume 14, Number2, 2022)
Full-Text HTML Full-Text PDF Cite
Computer Artist Manuel Felguerez: A Brief Interview on the Pioneering Origins of Geometry Painting

Abstract

This interview cum memoir of Manuel Felguerez, by the author, describes the development of two projects in the words of the Mexican artist Manuel Felguerez himself. Felguerez speaks of his experience as a Latin American artist, his encounter with digital technology in the united states and the trajectory of art that his work takes during an intense and experimental period of creativity in the seventies. Felguerez’s explorations were embodied in two books, El espacio multiple (Paz 1988) and “The Aesthetic Machine” La máquina estética (Felguerez y Sasson 1983).   The project involved the use of computers for the composition of incipient new media paintings, sculptures and engravings.  After the project was concluded, the author avoided the use of computers again, and for different reasons. The value of this interview of a pioneering artist in contemporary America lies in the insider’s view of the situation in the art world, the artist’s first-person revealings and confessions and the deep personal life of the artist as an individual.

Keywords: algorithm, computer, geometry painting, sculpture

This interview was taken in 2020, at Felguerez home in Mexico City. Felguerez is always kind enough to respond to your questions and reflect on his artwork. Felguerez started talking as he was asked about the beginnings and well-springs of his first inspiration for creating a work with computers:

“The origin of my artistic work in relation to technology is a bit casual. When I was a teacher at the School of Plastic Arts at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), I was assigned the task of teaching thirty hours of class every week.  You could call it a handful, or a plethora. I almost wasted the day at school. One day along with two other teachers I decided to ask the Technical Council for permission to give us ten hours each week, to dedicate just to research.  The Technical Council first said they agreed; however, the next day when we arrived at the school, and despite the Technical Council’s approval, we saw that other professors of the University cooked a scandal, and started demonstrating with banners and signs against this decision of the council. Someone said: “Teacher investigator, teacher aviator”.

The protesting teachers were afraid that this permission for independent research meant that it afforded an escape from teaching activity.  Because of the scale of the protest, the Technical Council retracted and finally cancelled the permit.  But the higher authorities of the University called the Coordination of Humanities and found out about the developments.  The. Committee then called us back and said: “…. look, a University organ that refuses to allow time for research is not worthy of being an organ of the University”.   Since then any teacher who joined the University with an appointment of a full-time position could do research as well.  That was like winning the lottery.

So, we had to make a formal request for the research hours. But then we were questioned, as to what we were going to investigate? I thought about a topic that was in the air; namely, one about the possibility of using the computer as a working instrument, one that is based on the layman’s grand idea that the computer is a device that calculates with a great speed.  Since I was interested in geometry, and mathematics, I set out to apply the possibility of the computer to produce or devise a project on art. I didn’t know what to call it at that time – an abstract artwork? But that was the origin. The project was based on two texts, one was called El espacio multiple (The Multiple Space) written by Octavio Paz in 1988. Following El espacio multiple, I proposed that the real plane does not exist, so that each geometric space could generate itself from a flat square or a relief to ultimately form a sculpture. This meant that if I made a half-circle and lifted it then I made a cone. This way I’m already creating a visual relief but if I grab it at the back and repeat the same or change the direction of accumulation, I could transform the whole geometrical base into other shapes and form a sculpture.

So I started working with the idea.  The first thing that I did was to analyze pictures.  I started a project with an architect friend and tried to solve a simple problem by asking ourselves the basic question of whether an abstract picture naturally has a prevenient top and bottom. We wonder how we know if it is “up” or “down”, and we started to analyze such pictures.  I do not remember if it was Rudolph Arnheim who forwarded a theory that says that in a painting there is a balance and that equilibrium implies a point at the center of the painting and hence each form that is made has a distance from the center and at the same time a relative specific weight. Turning an object into a zone of rays, and putting all the shapes in a box means that you could calculate its speed – the speed of rotation of an object.  If I let the painting move around its supposed gravitational center, it would start by turning in one direction.  As it stops it would tend to weigh more on one side than on the other. In order to find equilibrium, the painting would again start to rotate at a certain speed, oscillating between ends until it reached a kind of rest. That speed could act as a fingerprint. It could indicate my sense of a personal composition (since I initiated the balancing for a certain object in space).  I resolved this question of the speed of rotation in my paintings, and therefore, when I started doing the first experiments with a computer, I did more research to know about the visual trajectories of my personal ways of composing art.  Everything that fell off from a predictive pattern I erased; and everything that coincided I kept.  These patterns were not traces of what I had invented: only a kind of (template) form existed in my previous painting. So already, as if by chance, any random elements that the computer-generated from my interventions were then repeated in my new compositions, and hence it was not totally random.  As I kept searching, I kind of failed in my anticipations – the pre-existing patterns did not necessarily materialize into an aesthetically satisfactory shape but they gave me an idea, of new unknown compositions.  I remember for instance that drawing a circle on the computer was a very odd thing because it was like a collection of hundred lines that had a little peak on each intersection.

When I was doing all those experiments, I also decided to continue to write a book to justify three years of my work.  In the book titled The Aesthetic Machine (1983), on which I worked with Mayer Sasson who was studying distribution grids of electricity for New York City, working as an expert in the American Electric Power company.  He was a director and an expert in programming. And he was the one who gave me the idea of trying to see what happened while applying systems identification, for predictions. Systems analysis consists mostly of reiterations – like if I tried explaining with the example of a comet which approaches earth. Astronomers may observe it for 15 or 20 days, as it could be possible to identify what its behavior will be like in space in the next three hundred years or three thousand years, or even three million years. By extrapolating predictive analysis to my work, I wondered if I could discover what the fate of my artwork would be after 25 years from a given moment. The analysis would allow guessing what would happen to it in the future.  It’s like science fiction.  If I continued designing along that path, I could guess how my paintings would look like in the future. Well, we started to apply the computer’s results. I sent all my proposals from my Harvard computer to Mayer, who received them in New York and processed them and returned the results. One day he finally told me he had already completed writing the program. With my wife, I ??went to number one Broadway, where the offices had a large window of about 30 meters, and was a space full of machines with some people dressed in sky blue. These guys in blue operated the computers: they connected the results of the computer analysis on a plotter, and I began to see drawings like my own, though not exactly as if what I would consciously draw. The images flitted across at a speed of one per second. It produced a brutal emotion that showed that the experiment had somehow been successful. We continued working on that project for a while but we thought that the program had to be optimized. I mean that aesthetically my sensitivity led me to evaluate a drawing each time I ran the computer.  I had the drawings and every day I also corrected, I watched them and graded them for the best options.  I gave the highest grade of ten, then nine, eight and so to break down to zero. The next day I did the same with the options produced by the computer.

Well, since I had all that stuff, I asked myself, now what do I do with this? There I have them, I’m not sure what they meant: more than 4000 possibilities of my paintings in an imaginary parallel universe. If I were a merchant I would have set up something like an original cigar factory. But I was an artist. Well first I said, I have to pass this on as something that genuinely looks like art. As they were geometric drawings I called them ideograms but they were really ideas, but they were ideas for painting or sculpture.  I had to make paintings or sculptures with them.  Right there in Boston I made a ball of squares already with colors and everything, that along with some sculptures and models were going to end up in an exhibition at the Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts, in a building designed by Le Corbusier in Harvard. It seemed like the cycle was closed and I had already exhausted a mechanism that was like a puzzle: it was a mechanism with which I could change a square or a circle, or what could also produce infinite possibilities of harmonic color according to my creative prototype of colors.  All I did was use that kind of color that was already mechanized; once the first one was done, it needed nothing more than moving it so the computer could have done it too. But I didn’t get into that anymore. I said, if I grab and throw a 100-meter line by hand and make that the guiding line of my drawing, what will come out of the computer is something with lines like when you make a signature that is only yours, a personal line. Then embracing the options of color, and forms of the compositions produced with lines, I started thinking about musicalizing it. So, I wrote the book and took a decision, I do not know if it was good or bad at the time. I closed the computer and never opened it again. I have not opened it again, because it absorbed me – it was very exciting, it was everything I could hope for, but the beauty of the painting was in the accident. I said to myself that I either go down a path of subjectivity or I stay with the computer. If I keep the computer, then I may become a very famous technician in the field of artistic management of the computer, but life is going to fall away.

To recap, I received the Guggenheim Scholarship for Harvard in 1975. In Mexico I already began the exploration for El Espacio Multiple three years before, in 1971, 1972. I remember that computers were like wardrobes. There was IBM. They had black robes with a little slit to pass punched cards. At that time I learned Fortran 4. It was my language. All that was what I started with. During the seventies, my work was totally geometric. The computer was very much present in that period but from the eighties, I went in another direction. The drawings of that period are in my drawers now. Some of the paintings in my studio are from the seventies, some were converted to sculpture, and some other artworks were exhibited elsewhere in the world, in museums and private collections. I made paintings based on the compositions predicted by the computer, but they were, in a sense, also real paintings. The drawings came out of the computer, but after that, the full modificatory process the computer-generated compositions and artworks emerged like any normal painting.  But this was an era of my works in which little by little I also started changing. It began very simply but I was filling my works with pictorial elements until they no longer knew where they came from.

So here I recount my days in Boston with Mayer Sasson. I gave several interviews in American magazines and my work became very popular at that time.  Here in Mexico, in the Centro Multimedia there is a room that bears my name for this research.  Sometimes some researchers come from other places and countries to ask me about the project. This might mean something was left out, but from my side, it seems that going back to such work meant it was like being resigned to the computer once again. Yet I think of moving forward.

References

Felguérez, M., & Sasson, M. (1983). La máquina estética (Vol. 4). Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.

Paz, O. (1998). El espacio múltiple.

Interview: Critical Dialogue with Mamang Dai

/
867 views

In conversation with Jyotirmoy Prodhani1 & Urvashi Kuhad2

1Professor and Head of the Department of English at North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Email: rajaprodhani@gmail.com

2Assistant Professor at Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi. Email: urvashikuhad09@gmail.com

Rupkatha Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 2, April-June, 2022. Pages 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v14n2.ne44

First published: June 30, 2022 | AreaNortheast India | LicenseCC BY-NC 4.0

(This interview is published under Themed Issue on Literature of Northeast India)
Full-Text HTML Full-Text PDF Cite
PlumX Metrics

Jyotirmoy Prodhani (JP): We have amidst us one of the most versatile and charismatic writers from the Northeast known for her deeply nuanced poems and lyrical stories. Mamang Dai is one of the first and the finest writers writing in English from India’s Northeast. Born in Pasighat in Arunachal Pradesh, she did her schooling in Pine Mount, Shillong (Meghalaya) and did her graduation from Gauhati University. From Arunachal Pradesh, described as the ‘land of the rising sun’, she was the first woman from her state to become an IAS in 1979, the coveted civil service position in India. But she would leave the job to dedicate herself fully to her passion —writing. She had also worked for the major national dailies like The Hindustan Times, The Telegraph, The Sentinel and others. Recipient of one of the highest civilian awards of India, Padmashree in 2011, her first major work of fiction, The Legends of Pensam published in 2006 made an audacious entry into the world of letters where the unique way of telling stories would come to be known in the academy as the quintessential literary discourse from Northeast. Her novel The Black Hill (2014) where history, myths and memories merge into a narrative totality got her the prestigious Sahitya Akademi award in 2017, the first from Northeast to get the award for an English novel. Earlier Dr Temsula Ao got the award in 2013 for her collection of English short stories, Laburnum for My Head (2009). Mamang Dai has also received the Verrier Elwin award (2013) for her book Arunachal Pradesh: The Hidden Land. She is a poet, a novelist, and also a folklorist. Her collections of poetry include River Poems and Midsummer Survival Lyrics (2014) and also the novel Stupid Cupid (2008) as well as her other works like Mountain Harvest on the food of Arunachal Pradesh, Hambreelmai’s Loom, The Sky Queen, Once Upon a Moon time are collections of folklore for the young readers. She has recently edited a collection of women’s writings from Arunachal Pradesh: Inheritance of Words.

The magical lyricism is one of the hallmarks of her abiding prose. Pensam, the place in between, is described by her as “the small world where anything can happen and everything can be lived. With the narrow boat that we call life sails along somehow in calm or stormy weather where the life of man can be measured in the span of a song.” For her “all that matters is love and that memory gives life, and life never ends.”

 We welcome Mamang Dai, to this session of Critical Dialogue as part of the second Rupkatha International Online Conference. Also, I welcome my co-host, Urvashi Kuhad to the session. Welcome, Madam!

Mamang Dai (MD): Thank you so much, Professor Jyotirmoy Prodhani. You have been very very kind in your introduction. (And I am very sorry, you know, the network is so slow here. In fact it is non-existent.) So I was looking forward to this chat and hearing from you giving me such a kind introduction and putting so much attention to what you were saying, I really feel quite humbled. So thank you Rupkatha, and thank you also Dr Urvashi for being with us. Really! I don’t know where to start. I think Prof Jyotirmoy had said…

Jyotirmoy Prodhani (JP): Let’s begin with a small sort of a query just to get the ball rolling. In the history of Northeast fiction in English, of course, we can take the name of Temsula Ao as one of the pioneers of Northeast fiction in English, especially her books, These Hill Called Home, Laburnum for my Head. She is an important name. However, Legends of Pensam is a landmark achievement not only for you as a writer but also for the whole idea of Northeast fiction in English as a whole, for this happens to be one of the most significant works which characterize as typical Northeast story in terms of its unique narrative style, landscape it has depicted and the ethical worldview it is delineated. How did this whole idea of Pensam come to your mind and how did you plan this book, especially the structure of the work? It is quite unique in fact.

MD: Actually, Pensam started, you know, through a kind of journalistic notes. You must remember I was also a journalist at that time. And I have always been interested in the concept of myth, memory, time, myth, memory, meaning. ‘What is the meaning? myth, memory or imagination?’ ‘Is imagination greater than knowledge?’ You know, when you listen to some of the stories, which I was hearing firsthand, it’s unique, you have to pay a lot of attention and you have to pay a lot time. So, coming back after so many years of having been abroad and then rediscovering the land and the people (and also their stories). So, I was always interested in stories and I have my mother tongue this became like my journalistic notes. We have something called the Abang, this is the classical Adi literature, I am talking about the Adi tribe, which is the tribe I belong to in the Siang valley in the Pasighat area; so the Abang I found was really fascinating because it has all the aspirations, the spiritual longings, in the life of man and what it means to be a human person. Now the Abang is quite complex because in every Abang there are several Abangs-  and this is the epic narrative and every Abang begins with the same kind of introduction, let’s say a prelude, starting from the beginning which was very dark, and it’s like the creation myths and then it branches out. After that, the person who is reciting, the performer, who is the shaman, can take any of the branches of the big tree as it were. So, these stories fascinated me, and I found the whole world-view of people. If you are travelling in Arunachal Pradesh and you speak the language and you can really enter villages and sit with people, you can ask them about the forest, jungle lore, superstitions and we’ll find they always speak about the land in a kind of hesitant, cautious way and not as if they are trying to promote something which they think you might be interested in listening to. It’s as if they are talking about some relatives, quietly and calmly. So this was the basis of all my notes. That’s how the structure of the book came to my mind, set itself and then I had a little problem with the narrative, chronological the chronology not being linear, etc. style, because my publishers and editors also were saying this was waving back and forth, you know, but that’s the way I like to deal with time and memory.

Urvashi Kuhad (UK): Those are very very interesting thoughts Ma’am, and I have been holding a question inside me for a while and this is also an area of research that I have undertaken after coming across a couple of writers from the Northeast. I am teaching a paper on Indian Writing in English which has poetry from Robin Singh Ngangom. But Ma’am when you say you belong to the Adi tribe and you talked about classical Adi literature, how relevant do you think it is to keep our oral tradition alive? I am talking about folk literature, folk narrative and to what extent have these influenced your style of writing or the themes of your writing?

MD: I think the oral tradition because it’s so open to interpretation, even in one village we have various sub-clans, so they will be narrating it in a slightly different way. But the thread of the story, what I was saying this big tree, we all know the stories, so, that kind of gives us our sense of community and thereby our sense of identity in one form or the other and that binds us together. Oh, you know this story of how the goat got its horns? So, this is the folk culture that was transmitted orally. Now, of course, so many things are changing. I often think about an ecological term they use that – the predicament of the ‘place ‘faithful,’ see if you are going to save the tiger, for example, but the habitat is lost it is going to be a real uphill battle. Similarly, it’s something like that with our traditions. If you are losing habitat or the place is changing so much, people are travelling out, so all the things, that that becomes something to consider. Nevertheless, I think because we are doing this translation, and appropriating the myths and putting them into print, a kind of transcription work that is going on, I think that is important because they hold a lot of ethical views as well, which I think, are important for us. Personally, for me, I find great consolation. Professor Jyotirmoy was reading about the word Pensam and what it means, the last line, ‘where the life of a man can be measured in the span of a song’, that is my interpretation of one of the portions of Abang. There is something called pengey which is an elegy; when a person dies, you can call a special shaman to perform this song, it is sung all night, and the person has to be well-versed in the life of the deceased and he starts on this very long journey recounting, ‘Do you remember that place where your mother gave you that packet of rice?’ And they are travelling, travelling through all the childhood memories, and they are travelling up towards that destination where they have to part. And the singer will leave the person there, the soul of the person there and say, ‘You take care and we will be on our way, and you’ll be counted, and all your friends know where you are going.’ And then he takes the form of a bird, a hawk, and flies back in case the soul tries to follow him and that kind of thing. But I think the concept, the imagination is quite beautiful, even though it was only orally chanted.

JP: Madam, when it comes to narrative, what we call the Northeastern literary narrative, though this is a fiction and, of course, we know fiction is a western import here, but what makes literature of Northeast (unique) is its whole mode of presentation which departs in a very significant way from other modes of writing happening in the same language in other parts of India. What do you think are the quintessential elements/ components that together compose the typical Northeast ethos in the writing from this particular region? Which might have also been in resonance in your writings as well.

MD: Northeast ethos…I think Prof Jyotirmoy is throwing such hard questions at me. But I think there’s a sense of, with people at least I meet, especially in rural parts of Northeast, of being truthful. Great attention and great importance is given to being truthful. The truth matters and I think this also, if somewhere along the way, when you are writing, you kind of discover a more authentic part of yourself then I think this gives it a kind of the ethical view. Because, if you’re truthful and we have the worship of the sun and moon, not exactly the worship, but the belief of sun and moon, so this has also to do with the idea of justice, with being true to yourself. We have a saying in Adi which says  ‘agii a:pii em gesilangka,’ which means, ‘Please (delete ‘please’)  ‘wear your own heart. Don’t try to be something you are not.’ And I think in the present many writers in the Northeast are trying to take this body of lost or forgotten histories, bringing it out but with a degree of being authentic.

JP: Madam, in the famous novel The Black Hill for which you have received the Sahitya Akademi Award, history is one of the focal points there which is one a major inspiration for this work of fiction but also you’ve used the mythologies, the memories that you have spoken about, and also ecology. How do you allow these elements to converge into the totality of a narrative? What is your treatment of history from the perspective of a native position?

MD: When I started The Black Hill, I stumbled upon it by chance. The story of Father Nicolas Krick because I was doing research for another work. Then I found someone called Father Krick had come up to this village, not very far from Pasighat which is my hometown, so I tried to find out a bit more and it was not easy because people remembered the British when they had come up in the early 19th century but nobody seemed to remember Father Krick. He had been there for five days and the report of his stay at that time was in the Calcutta Archives (which was published in the journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal).  So, I got that translated version into English by Father Rev. A Gille.

Then that’s how the story began. I could kind of see this image of this young priest, you know, striding through the forest and then suddenly emerging. He was so keen on his mission to Tibet. He wasn’t looking for Arunachal or convert here but he was on his route to Tibet. And that’s how things happened but I felt history actually is a meeting place, there are so many possibilities that we don’t really know what happened. Even in The Black Hill the character of Gimur, right at the end I had put, ‘they didn’t know what the history books would say about them,’ maybe so and so died in the village war and she herself disappeared from history. So that was my way of being authentic, because Gimur is just a fictional character, the priest is true, the tribal chief is true but Gimur was just there as a narrator but I thought I should put in some truth and say she no longer exists. So that was my way of being a little bit true to possibilities. Maybe there was such a person, who knows, but at this point, I had just created her. And I was also interested in the nature of spirituality. I felt if the priest and the tribal chief could have interacted for a bit more time, if things had been a little bit different, because he was beginning to see also that ultimately it was not about conversion or preaching, it was just speaking the language of the hearts. And the life they believed in, what they believed and that gives them the reason for being honoured, that gives their life’s meaning. So that kind of thing I was trying to propose.

JP: You also brought in a lot of memories, mythologies, and the creation of the character against a historical backdrop which is a real story. Did you have some hesitations so as to deal with (them), how you negotiate with the possible contour of it?

MD: I did think because a priest coming from the Paris foreign missions NB- Paris Foreign Missions, and a French Jesuit priest, I can’t make him think and feel, you know, the way I wanted someone to think and feel because he knows his theology, he was an ordained priest, he was giving mass. I delved into the history of Jesuits, Ignatius Loyola, then I dragged my parents even on a trip from Guwahati to Shillong to the Don Bosco Mission there, I went to a Jesuit house in Guwahati but nobody knew very much about Father Krick. It was the time of martyrs when the far east was far more important. People were being killed in Japan. Recently all kinds of films were also made about that period. Father Krick and his assistant Father Augustin Bourry both of them were just struggling on. I can’t imagine how they travelled from Guwahati, right up on elephant, on boat, on foot, you know. I thought it was really quite remarkable the passion these people had. Even now it was easier for me to go to Paris, to the foreign Missions, rather than to go where Father Krick had been on foot in my own home state in Anjaw district, because there was a landslide, I had to wait for the right time, then I had to enlist the help of the local politicians to give me a car and some help. The language is also different there, from that of Adi. So that kind of thing. I was careful to look at his notes and some things I imagined what he might have felt from the little things he left. He was an anthropologist actually, he became fascinated with the forest, the swing rope bridge, the Tibetan beads, prayer wheels and so that was how the book was written. And then when I actually went to that spot and met with people some village elders remembered from his father’s father that ‘Oh, yes!’. I said, ‘Did no one claim Kajinsha’s body, the Mishmi Chief?’ I went to Dibrugarh jail also to look up how he might have felt there, so suffocated after having lived so openly in the mountains. The first tribal man may be to be hung in the Dibrugarh jail. What rage, what frustration he might have felt but this man told me, ‘No, how could we go? How would anyone go to claim his body?’ At that time, it was impossible but still, I made Gimur to go (smiling) and do a few things in the prison because there is a record in the British Archives in the history books that two guards were killed and the French foreign Missions had pleaded for mercy, for the killer, but they had hung him because of the death of the prison guard. So, one of the prison guards I made Gimur kill and that was how this story went.

JP: We have a little bit of time left. Before that Urvashi might be having a question, but I would like to know, that many of the audience here would also like to know that, your location, that is Arunachal Pradesh, when it comes to the pan-Indian imagination of this particular place, there seems to be a geographic duality. In our imagination, it is the frontier but it is also geographically the first place in India where the sun rises first, i.e., in your place. So from that place, you are the beginning but for the (so-called) mainstream, you are the ending, sort of, that is the paradox of this location. How do you look at your own place from the point of view of the mainstream back to your own place and how it might have had reflected in your writings as well?

MD: About my writings, Professor, I don’t know, it’s just that okay I am here and these are the stories or I was able to transcribe them or set them into a different alphabet or language. But…

UK: Ma’am I wanted to ask you about women characters, the women that are present in your tales. What I observed is that women occupied central spaces in your tales and how do you see their sense of construction, their expressions basically? You also, through these women, these characters, you also at a point have often tried to make a subtle critique of both the native tribal society as well as the typical patriarchal and racial urban mainland. So how do you see these two kinds of womanhood, a kind of paradox that comes up? On one hand, the woman emerging or present rather in the native tribal society as well as women who are part of the urban mainland and how they assert themselves in society?

MD: I think I have always felt women are the more enduring. Throughout history we have seen there are a lot of wild, wonderful, warrior women, right from Biblical times or Cleopatra, Dido, Queen of Carthage, the Amazons, and even in the Ramayana and Mahabharata, things like that. But I have a close connection with my sisters, cousins, kith and kin, so I find them the most fascinating to look at womanhood who do things, who endure, who fulfil obligations, who want more but can still laugh about not having it. That is a kind of lesson. You don’t always have to be in the forefront for rights. You can take it any time you want in your own little circle. And we have a patriarchal society and it is very tough on child marriage, and forced marriage. But things are changing. But within that context, if you take womanhood, what it means to be a woman, I think many women are happy also. If the men in the villages are in a similar situation when both are leaning on each other. So, that’s how I look at it. Maybe there is not so much need to come and talk about women’s rights where it is not in that environment where they can acquire or have it. But I think women are much more flexible and resilient.

Reactions from the audience:

John R. Baker (JRB): yes, Ma’am. I was very impressed, very, very heartfelt impressed. Listening to you talk about this area, I didn’t know about this area in your part of the world. It just impressed me in very very solid ways. I have some background in epic literature, strong women characters are there in that literary tradition. Forgive me if this is off-topic and not connected, but I’m curious. Do you see any connections between the older epic literature and the type of oral tradition, and the oral tradition of the epic literature (the oral retelling of our earliest epic works) that was eventually written down and the oral retelling that you have explained today and where it’s going? Do you see any connections here? Any similarities, any differences? The Green Knight, Homer and the Iliad.

MD: I think that’s the great adventure of epic narratives. We are lucky the whole world has these stories. Look at the Icelandic sagas, we are all watching them. They’ve been made into films. Even when I saw Avatar, I thought this could be one of our stories; this huge big tree we worship, you know that kind of thing. So in the retelling maybe it even evolves, but what is the core of that story, I think, that stays. In the end, we have to win maybe but at what cost? And we have to look at the environment around us; we may need wolves to help us, maybe a polar bear will come out of the snow, so that kind of thing. So I think that is very fascinating, that is the wonderment of living, seeing this continuity of human life and all other lives.

JRB: Thank you so much, Ma’am.

MD: Thank you, John.

UK: There is a question in the chatbox where it says, an anonymous id. He or she wants to know the category of Northeast writing. Is there something that commonly ties writers from the Northeast or how do we categorize Northeast writing? Is it a permissible category? Or is it narrowing down the categories way too much to call everything as Northeast literature?

MD: Thank you for your question. I think we have reached this point Dr Kuhad, Professor Jyotirmoy was also talking about Arunachal at the edge, a kind of liminal space or what is beyond. At the moment, at least among my friends, the writers, and the Northeast Writers Forum, we know we share the geographical affinities of the area. And because it is quite new, the writings coming out in English altogether, so there will be similarities of land, the landscape but I think this is going to change or it will change because another generation of writers will see things differently. Already people are writing about so many other things. Even just the simple image of a rain cloud or mist on your shoulder that is becoming almost like science fiction. So, we don’t know where it will go; but that is fine also, it goes where it will. It .depends on the feeling of the author and being aware of what you are trying to do, because writing, after all, is the juxtaposition of what you are and what you’re trying to say, what you feel, and what you want to share. You want to be left alone but there is something you want to share so that the other person comes in. But I am not like this with my relatives, let’s say, I am totally different as a writer and as a person talking to them. But they are patient with me. That is how things happen. But I think in the future there will be other writings. The land is not here for us to promote, delineate with a lot of romance or love all the time. Things will change and there will be other stories, I think.

JP: Just to have a cue from Mamang Dai about Northeast. Northeast as terminology is not accidental. It has come from a historical terrain, historical trajectories, geo-ethnic factors involved. Northeast also is an official terminology in our Constitution and besides, because of Northeast we have rather become visible. Literature of every state is there, like Manipur literature is there which is very rich, Assamese literature is there, very rich, Tripura, they have their literature. But Northeast as a kind of common platform for creative expression has happened in a huge way and in a very significant way which has helped our writers, and our voices to be heard as a collective entity. It has really helped to gain visibility all across. It has helped us to gain the kind of attention that we wanted to draw. Otherwise, we have disparate literary traditions, Assamese writing tradition, Manipuri writing tradition. But when it comes to the Northeast then it becomes a formidable body of literary articulations. Is there any other question?

UK: Ma’am has been so patient and kind throughout. Thank you, Ma’am. To put in between, you mentioned a couple of keywords which got me so alert. You talked about folk culture and folk studies. I am working on that and it really interests me. In fact, science fiction is one of my areas of work. My PhD is in Indian science fiction and that intrigues me. It was so nice to hear from you even though you are talking about classical literature. Of course, you talked about a lot many things, but there is an all-rounded view which inspires people like me, you know I am in the academic field and I teach and this enthuses me with more confidence and energy to be working more on such ideas.

JP: Thanks to Mamang Mai Madam for being here, and thanks to Tarun Tapas for having facilitated the session. We are concluding the session. Thank you so much for being here. Hope you are here for longer sessions as well.

The Video of the Session

Acknowledgements

This is the transcription of the Critical Dialogue Session (hosted on 28 August 2021 as part of the Rupkatha International Open Conference 2021 (RIOC 2021). The session was coordinated by Dr Deepanjali Misra, KIIT, Bhubaneshwar and Pragati Das, Bhatter College, Dantan.

Transcription from the video has been done by Bondita Baruah, Research Scholar, Dept. of English, NEHU, Shillong.

Jyotirmoy Prodhani is a Professor and Head of the Department of English at North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His teaching and research interests include, inter alia, Theatre and Performance Studies, Translation, and Northeast Literature. ORCID i/d 0000-0002-3420-4322   Email: rajaprodhani@gmail.com

Urvashi Kuhad is an Assistant Professor at Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi, She did her PhD in Indian Science Fiction and is a Fulbright Fellow at the University of Texas at Austin, USA. She was also at the University of Western Ontario, Canada as a fellow. She is widely published and her teaching interests include Northeast Literature. Email: urvashikuhad09@gmail.com