With this edition (Vol. V, No. 3) the Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities completes five years of its glorious presence online. The journal was conceived mainly as a scholarly platform seeking standardization of scholarship and research, and as an online experiment helped by the Web 2.0 phenomenon for dissemination and access in non-profit model on a user-friendly interface on the digital media. With the very first issue we took up measures for standardizing its publishing system following certain established global norms, and the journal began to be recognized by scholarly indexing, archiving and directory and library services like EBSCO, Elsevier Scopus, MLA, DOAJ, Archive-it etc. But the biggest recognition and acceptance came from scholars who contributed to it as readers, authors and editors. We have been trying very hard in spite of being a non-profit initiative, to improve the quality with every issue and introduced new user-friendly services following certain norms—scholarly, ethical, technical. New areas were selected for research and enquiry, and new scholarly voices were encouraged and promoted. Several special issues were brought out successfully with much enthusiasm from different parts of the globe. Keep Reading
A journal may be called an “international journal” on the basis of certain criteria. With the arrival of online journals, certain new points should be noted:
A) An international journal should have international subscribers from a good number of countries. It is not sufficient to have international authors or editors to call a journal ‘international’. Rather a journal has to be judged on the basis of its reception by the readers/users and by its impact in the field of research.
B) The best way to judge is to see whether the journal is included in international directories and databases like EBSCO, Elsevier, MLA, DOAJ, Ulrichs etc.
C) Many universities have digital libraries and it is to be noted whether the journal is included in reputed institutional digital libraries. However, this is applicable for online journals.
D) Then, the quality of the journal has to be judged on the basis of its citation index. Google Scholar can be used to see how often articles from the journal are cited.
E) For scientific journal Thompson Reuters Impact Factor has to be considered.
F) In the wake of “publish or perish” policy, many fake journals have popped up both in electronic and print formats and they claim to be ‘international’ on some dubious criteria in order to earn money from the authors. Many use ISSN as standard of quality. But ISSN is not indicative of policy; rather its value is in numerical indexing of periodicals. A strict policy should be formed internationally for allowing a journal such terms on the header or in the title itself. An international authoritative body should be there to issue such certificates.
You might be interested in
Carolina Ferrer, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Canada Download PDF Version Abstract In this article, I propose an alternative
With this edition (Vol. V, No. 3) the Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities completes five years of its
A journal can be called a ‘national’ journal on the basis of its production, reception and impact factors. It should